Under Terry v. Ohio, what may an officer do during a stop if they reasonably believe the individual may be armed?

Get ready for the Northern Virginia Criminal Justice Training Academy Exam 1. Utilize our flashcards and detailed explanations to enhance your preparation. Excel in your exam!

Multiple Choice

Under Terry v. Ohio, what may an officer do during a stop if they reasonably believe the individual may be armed?

Explanation:
During a Terry stop, if an officer reasonably believes the person may be armed, the officer may perform a limited pat-down of the outer clothing to feel for weapons. This protective frisk is allowed specifically to ensure the officer’s safety and is confined to locating weapons, not to search for evidence or belongings. It’s grounded in the need to neutralize potential threats during a stop when there’s reasonable suspicion the individual is armed and dangerous. The other options go beyond what Terry permits: arresting without probable cause, searching a home, or seizing property without justification all require separate legal grounds beyond a pat-down for weapons.

During a Terry stop, if an officer reasonably believes the person may be armed, the officer may perform a limited pat-down of the outer clothing to feel for weapons. This protective frisk is allowed specifically to ensure the officer’s safety and is confined to locating weapons, not to search for evidence or belongings. It’s grounded in the need to neutralize potential threats during a stop when there’s reasonable suspicion the individual is armed and dangerous. The other options go beyond what Terry permits: arresting without probable cause, searching a home, or seizing property without justification all require separate legal grounds beyond a pat-down for weapons.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy